* bug#4472: marked as done (23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys)
2009-09-17 22:51 ` bug#4472: 23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys Drew Adams
@ 2009-09-19 21:35 ` Emacs bug Tracking System
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-09-19 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chong Yidong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 890 bytes --]
Your message dated Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:28:54 -0400
with message-id <87ws3ur5d5.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: 23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys
has caused the Emacs bug report #4472,
regarding 23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)
--
4472: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4472
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4823 bytes --]
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
Subject: 23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:51:39 -0700
Message-ID: <E2306B43F9934BBEBEF5A949D82EEA5E@us.oracle.com>
I find the Emacs manual not to be very helpful about how to bind key
sequences. I couldn't even find the form (kbd...) in the manual, and
I thought that was what we are now recommending in general (no?).
I tried using `i' in the manual to find information about how to bind
keys, but it wasn't very helpful. I looked for `binding', and the only
index entry was for node Commands. I tried `i key TAB' and saw lots
that looks similar (rebinding, binding,...). Not too clear to me.
I finally found node Init Rebinding (weird name, BTW). It had examples
of using strings such as "\C-z" and vectors such as [?\C-=] and
[C-mouse-1], but it had nothing about `kbd' or the form [(control
mouse-1)].
I didn't find a node that explained the various formats and their
different uses and limitations. I didn't find any general format
recommendations. I didn't find any link in Init Rebinding to another
node that might explain such things - the only link there sends you to
a node explaining details about keyboard encodings and binding
non-ASCII keys.
Where is the introductory, top-level explanation about recommended
ways to bind keys? Surely that's something that even lots of
non-expert users do. The Key Bindings node (from node Customization)
sends you immediately into the depths of understanding keymaps - no
introduction there about binding keys AFAICT.
I did find information about `kbd' in the Elisp manual, and even some
text that stresses its convenience and portability. But that
information is missing from the Emacs manual AFAICT. IIUC, this is
info that is quite important for most users. There are often questions
at help-gnu-emacs about how to bind keys, and the answer there is
typically: "Use kbd". If this is a FAQ, then the answer belongs in the
Emacs manual, no?
I this kind of info belongs in the Emacs manual and I hope that
someone can find the time to add it (or move it) there.
In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2009-07-29 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.4)'
[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1536 bytes --]
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: <4472-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>
Subject: Re: 23.1; Emacs manual not too helpful about binding keys
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:28:54 -0400
Message-ID: <87ws3ur5d5.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> Please read the whole bug report, and filter out whatever has been fixed since
> then.
I've checked in some changes which should clarify things.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread