From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2942: marked as done (rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:55:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1239360909-23366-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239361483 9056 80.91.229.12 (10 Apr 2009 11:04:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:04:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 10 13:06:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LsEYI-0003rx-5M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:05:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LsEWt-0004HN-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:04:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LsEWg-0004EH-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LsEWb-0004CW-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40318 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LsEWb-0004CQ-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:03:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42086) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LsEWW-0002J9-4T; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3AB3nGe026046; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 04:03:50 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n3AAt9dd023647; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:55:09 -0700 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 2942 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27055 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1239360909-23366-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:44 +0300 with message-id <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> and subject line Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl fi= le has caused the Emacs bug report #2942, regarding rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com immediately.) --=20 2942: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D2942 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1239360909-23366-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Apr 2009 21:16:25 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA,MDO_DATING14, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n39LGJcV004254 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:16:20 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bf-0002Bu-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028n-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls1bZ-00028e-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51285) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0006uL-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls1bZ-0000wv-2k; Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:13 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file X-Spook: chameleon man Clinton rail gun Lexis-Nexis eavesdropping X-Ran: lJY[E4fhB!YN|Wl}`l/C8UbMwsaRJRZ X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Severity: serious Let `foo' be a Babyl format mail file: emacs -Q C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET works fine. The individual messages are processed correctly. emacs -Q M-x rmail RET C-u g foo RET does not work correctly. Emacs says "No mail". If the RMAIL buffer was empty originally, the raw Babyl file is dumped into the buffer. If there was mail originally, there is no apparent change in the RMAIL buffer, but the Babyl file is invisibly appended to the end of the file. At the least, Emacs should refuse to get new mail from a Babyl file if it cannot handle it. Preferably, it should be able to handle it. (This is unrelated to the latest Rmail changes.) ------------=_1239360909-23366-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 2942-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Apr 2009 10:48:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,MDO_DATING14 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (mtaout6.012.net.il [84.95.2.16]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3AAmHpX021557 for <2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:48:19 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KHV00B00SFJXC00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for 2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.70.19]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KHV00CAGSNJ1C60@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:47 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:47:44 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#2942: rmail unable to get new mail from a Babyl file In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris Cc: 2942-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83myao3hv3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tz4x327m.fsf@gnu.org> > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 2942@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com > Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:23:45 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Where did the Babyl file come in the first place? > > From Emacs 22.3. (I'm not sure what you're getting at.) > > Emacs 22.3 `C-u g' will happily take either a Babyl or mbox file as > input, converting it to the appropriate format. I don't see why this > should be different now. I think I fixed it. Please try the latest CVS. (There's an unrelated -- or so I think -- bug in unrmail, whereby some messages are badly converted from Babyl -- e.g., they get two X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES headers. But that happens even if you type "C-u M-x rmail RET foo RET". I'm working on this.) ------------=_1239360909-23366-0--