From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2805: marked as done (23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command?) Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:25:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <873acxbb1u.fsf@jurta.org> <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1238275503-1684-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238276653 16090 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2009 21:44:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:44:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 22:45:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LngLD-00049C-C9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LngJq-0007XD-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:43:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LngJm-0007WW-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:43:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LngJg-0007UZ-JJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:43:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48827 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LngJg-0007UW-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:54482) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LngJf-00067x-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2SLhkDW006431; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:43:46 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2SLP4Cn001795; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:25:04 -0700 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 2805 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:26717 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1238275503-1684-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:09 +0200 with message-id <873acxbb1u.fsf@jurta.org> and subject line Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-compl= etions a command? has caused the Emacs bug report #2805, regarding 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com immediately.) --=20 2805: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D2805 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1238275503-1684-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Mar 2009 22:31:06 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2RMV3P1030523 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:31:04 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:56627 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKZq-00032G-G1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKZo-000183-1T for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:31:02 -0400 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:20849) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LnKRj-0007IX-Sc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:22:40 -0400 Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by acsinet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n2RMNXSg004360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:23:34 GMT Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85]) by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n2RMMaYr023007 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:22:37 GMT Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.161.92) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:30 -0700 From: "Drew Adams" To: Subject: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:22:36 -0700 Message-ID: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcmvKogw+COFoVepSWCkXu9e4CXM+A== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Source-IP: acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.49CD51A8.013D:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) emacs -Q Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an interactive function? I don't see where that feature is used anywhere. In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-02-01 on SOFT-MJASON Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)' ------------=_1238275503-1684-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 2805-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Mar 2009 21:19:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2SLJawg000464 for <2805-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:19:37 -0700 Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LnfwF-0000i0-Bl; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:35 +0200 From: Juri Linkov To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 2805-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Drew Adams Subject: Re: bug#2805: 23.0.90; why is minibuffer-default-add-completions a command? Organization: JURTA References: <009a01c9af2a$88d7a190$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87wsaa1pfx.fsf@jurta.org> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:19:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:06 -0400") Message-ID: <873acxbb1u.fsf@jurta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanner-Signature: b36477657b07eb27dc67b07df918f397 X-DrWeb-checked: yes >>> Should `minibuffer-default-add-completions' really be an >>> interactive function? I don't see where that feature is >>> used anywhere. > >> Hmm, I don't remember why it was implemented as interactive. >> But now I see no reason why it should be interactive. > > It may have been convenient when testing it. Please remove the > (interactive) thingy. Done. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/ ------------=_1238275503-1684-0--