* bug#1193: marked as done (23.0.60; doc string of bookmark-set)
2008-10-17 16:01 ` bug#1193: 23.0.60; doc string of bookmark-set Drew Adams
@ 2009-10-05 1:55 ` Emacs bug Tracking System
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-10-05 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Karl Fogel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 850 bytes --]
Your message dated Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:47:40 -0400
with message-id <87vdiumx1f.fsf@red-bean.com>
and subject line Fixed "doc string of bookmark-set"
has caused the Emacs bug report #1193,
regarding 23.0.60; doc string of bookmark-set
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)
--
1193: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1193
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3745 bytes --]
From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: <emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org>
Subject: 23.0.60; doc string of bookmark-set
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:01:24 -0700
Message-ID: <001201c93071$9b2b8c90$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com>
The doc string says:
Typing C-u inserts the name of the last bookmark used in the buffer
(as an aid in using a single bookmark name to track your progress
through a large file). If no bookmark was used, then C-u inserts the
name of the file being visited.
This is unclear - "inserts...in the buffer" can give the impression
that the last bookmark that was used (anywhere) is inserted in the
(current) buffer. Even if you figure out that it means that it is the
last bookmark that was used in the (current) buffer that is inserted,
it's not clear where that is inserted. And in fact it is inserted
nowhere - it is simply provided as the default value for the bookmark
name.
Also, is it correct for the doc string to say this?
Set a bookmark named NAME inside a file.
Why "inside a file"? Nowadays you can set bookmarks in Info
etc. (granted, ultimately that is a file, but it is not what the doc
string suggests).
Also, no reason to quote "push" in the doc string.
In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2008-10-03 on LENNART-69DE564
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include
-fno-crossjumping'
[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1609 bytes --]
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
To: 1193-close@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Fixed "doc string of bookmark-set"
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:47:40 -0400
Message-ID: <87vdiumx1f.fsf@red-bean.com>
fixed
--
Thanks for the report. Fix committed:
$ cvs ci -F msg lisp/bookmark.el lisp/ChangeLog
/sources/emacs/emacs/lisp/bookmark.el,v <-- lisp/bookmark.el
new revision: 1.129; previous revision: 1.128
/sources/emacs/emacs/lisp/ChangeLog,v <-- lisp/ChangeLog
new revision: 1.16355; previous revision: 1.16354
Mailing notification to emacs-diffs@gnu.org... sent.
$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread