bug#1156: marked as done (23.0.60; With SVN, vc-print-log places cursor at end of buffer)

[don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 917 bytes --]


Your message dated Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:08:51 +1300
with message-id <18684.15507.928888.165386@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
and subject line Re: bug#1156: 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-print-log places cursor at end of buffer
has caused the Emacs bug report #1156,
regarding 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-print-log places cursor at end of buffer
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1156: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1156
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2602 bytes --]

From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
Subject: 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-print-log places cursor at end of buffer
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:04:30 +1300
Message-ID: <18674.58606.237911.629088@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>


With SVN, vc-print-log places the cursor and displays at the end of the buffer.
With CVS, it places the cursor at the version of the visited file.  This seems
to me to be the logical thing to do.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob



[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1963 bytes --]

From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Cc: 1156-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#1156: 23.0.60; With SVN, vc-print-log places cursor at end of buffer
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:08:51 +1300
Message-ID: <18684.15507.928888.165386@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>

 > > With SVN, vc-print-log places the cursor and displays at the end of
 > > the buffer. With CVS, it places the cursor at the version of the
 > > visited file.
 > 
 > For me, SVN behaves like you say CVS does, ie puts cursor on current
 > revision.

I see now that I hadn't updated properly and this was related to the earlier
bug where the mode line showed the last committed revision instead of the
working revision.

So I've closed the report.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob