all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
@ 2008-10-10 17:56 ` jidanni
  2008-10-16  7:25   ` bug#1142: marked as done (M-x man vs. underlining) Emacs bug Tracking System
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jidanni @ 2008-10-10 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bug-gnu-emacs

$ emacs -Q
M-x man man
One notices the total lack of underlining emphasis vs. $ man man in the shell,
or M-x woman. What should be underlined appears as plain text. Or
maybe it's just me... emacs-version "22.2.1"
By the way, woman shows the table in that page as 1@Executable... however.







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* bug#1142: marked as done (M-x man vs. underlining)
  2008-10-10 17:56 ` bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining jidanni
@ 2008-10-16  7:25   ` Emacs bug Tracking System
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2008-10-16  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Glenn Morris

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]


Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:16:45 -0400
with message-id <t2od1l6mci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
has caused the Emacs bug report #1142,
regarding M-x man vs. underlining
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
1142: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1142
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2244 bytes --]

From: jidanni@jidanni.org
To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: M-x man vs. underlining
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:56:50 +0800
Message-ID: <87od1ss599.fsf@jidanni.org>

$ emacs -Q
M-x man man
One notices the total lack of underlining emphasis vs. $ man man in the shell,
or M-x woman. What should be underlined appears as plain text. Or
maybe it's just me... emacs-version "22.2.1"
By the way, woman shows the table in that page as 1@Executable... however.




[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1462 bytes --]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: 1142-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:16:45 -0400
Message-ID: <t2od1l6mci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>


2008-10-16  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>

  * man.el (Man-getpage-in-background): Force recent `man's
  to output escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty.  (Bug#1142)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-16  7:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <t2od1l6mci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
2008-10-10 17:56 ` bug#1142: M-x man vs. underlining jidanni
2008-10-16  7:25   ` bug#1142: marked as done (M-x man vs. underlining) Emacs bug Tracking System

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.