From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1055: marked as done (Processed: severity 994 wishlist) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:05:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87ljxa1jil.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1222740306-20445-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222740629 21958 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2008 02:10:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:10:29 +0000 (UTC) To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 30 04:11:27 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkUhy-0000iG-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:11:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51169 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgv-0002vm-E9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgc-0002kf-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgZ-0002jb-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42777 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkUgZ-0002jT-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49350) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkUgY-0000Fh-FM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8U29tp1021514; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:09:56 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m8U256GN020488; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:05:06 -0700 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 1055 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20887 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1222740306-20445-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:59:14 -0400 with message-id <87ljxa1jil.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> and subject line Re: Processed: severity 994 wishlist has caused the Emacs bug report #1055, regarding Processed: severity 994 wishlist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com immediately.) --=20 1055: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1055 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1222740306-20445-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 29 Sep 2008 23:38:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8TNcYJK015855 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:38:36 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkSK2-0006My-Jp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:38:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkSK0-0006Mm-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:38:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53609 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkSK0-0006Mj-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:38:32 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:15897) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkSJz-00040c-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:38:31 -0400 Received: from rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (rgmgw2.us.oracle.com [138.1.186.111]) by agminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m8TNc6h4011323; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:38:06 -0500 Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85]) by rgmgw2.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.2.4) with ESMTP id m8TNc41R015802; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:38:05 -0600 Received: from dradamslap1 (/141.144.81.233) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:38:04 +0000 From: "Drew Adams" To: "'Emacs bug Tracking System'" , "'Chong Yidong'" , <994@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> Cc: "'Emacs Bugs'" References: <87k5culgm2.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Subject: RE: Processed: severity 994 wishlist Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:38:16 -0700 Message-ID: <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AckiiKlqWDH2UMRoTnmutw3/gGaUMwAAuZiw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 > From: Emacs bug Tracking System Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:50 PM > Processing commands for control@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com: > > > severity 994 wishlist > bug#994: 23.0.60; minibuffer completion should act on all > minibuffer input > Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' Why is this fodder for the wishlist? This bug is a regression! Stefan asked for a recipe to reproduce it, so no doubt this behavior is not intentional (not a design change). It is bad, bugged behavior, and it is new. Why on earth would such a bug report be classified as "wish list"? Perhaps you are simply wishing bugs away? ;-) ------------=_1222740306-20445-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1055-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Sep 2008 01:58:27 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8U1wI4u018353; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:58:19 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50C6257E341; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:59:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: "Drew Adams" Cc: "'Emacs bug Tracking System'" , <994@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>, 1055-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: Re: Processed: severity 994 wishlist References: <87k5culgm2.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:59:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001101c9228c$728367b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:38:16 -0700") Message-ID: <87ljxa1jil.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 "Drew Adams" writes: > Why is this fodder for the wishlist? This bug is a regression! > > Stefan asked for a recipe to reproduce it, so no doubt this behavior is not > intentional (not a design change). It is bad, bugged behavior, and it is new. > > Why on earth would such a bug report be classified as "wish list"? Perhaps you > are simply wishing bugs away? ;-) Please don't make a separate CC to bug-gnu-emacs; that creates a new bug entry. Just reply to NNN@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. The bug in question is not a regression, unless you have a rather broad definition of "regression". It is neither obviously buggy nor new, so I'd prefer it if people work on the other outstanding issues first. But if it bugs you that much... patch welcome. I don't want to waste time debating bug classification. ------------=_1222740306-20445-0--