From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110582: Fix wording of error message in staticpro. Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5080564C.5090309@dancol.org> <3slif3qzvf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83ipa71p3j.fsf@gnu.org> <83hapr0xwz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350668486 5005 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2012 17:41:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 19:41:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZh-0003eg-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52203 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZa-0003jc-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZX-0003gX-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZV-0003mD-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZV-0003m9-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPGZU-0005up-9R; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:41:20 -0400 X-Spook: rs9512c Bin Laden SEAL Team 6 assassinate NWO X-Ran: S3a;s/n2unC%J0JU{,[RZP6ITELJx*gAGCrSVwewZ2g}5&gbt3z6j>OjT2W~8jL0S**!ND X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83hapr0xwz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:38:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154446 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't see the connection. The issue here is that _maintainers_ of > Emacs who get the bug report will instantly know what to do instead of > running Emacs under a debugger or asking the OP to do so. fatal ("NSTATICS too small."); conveys that information to me, and does not suggest that the user go away and try to work around the problem without reporting it.