From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18891: Doesn't handle pwd = /C: very well Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87d293dtc5.fsf@gmx.de> <83lhnqvqt9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415122638 10927 80.91.229.3 (4 Nov 2014 17:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 17:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18891@debbugs.gnu.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 04 18:37:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2Z-0001mB-5i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:37:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2Y-00056b-PQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2U-00053c-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2Q-0006gr-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2Q-0006gh-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2Q-0006re-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18891 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18891-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18891.141512261426347 (code B ref 18891); Tue, 04 Nov 2014 17:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18891) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2014 17:36:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2I-0006qs-CH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:35437) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2G-0006qh-DM for 18891@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xli2F-00019b-5X; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:36:51 -0500 X-Spook: Crypto AG Sundevil CipherTAC-2000 Telex Kh-11 ammunition X-Ran: rAxH(g*`9)Hhri2Q\&/!X\_T:uC@e[N|}`OEJi?${?8J`op6wh44`,z[XUxXoe#p X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83lhnqvqt9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2014 19:06:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95488 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> if a directory name happens to match a tramp pattern, as "/C:" >> presumably does, how about first checking if a local directory literally >> named that exists, before invoking a remote handler? > > That's probably something Emacs should do _before_ invoking the > handler, no? I mean, the decision whether to let the handler do this > job is outside the scope of the handler. That's what I meant, I think...