From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neal Becker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: horrible performance on long lines Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240448680 32544 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2009 01:04:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:04:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 03:05:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LwnNH-0000Cp-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:05:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwnLs-0005gc-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwnLn-0005fX-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwnLi-0005Zy-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60301 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwnLi-0005Zv-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:43031 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwnLh-0000rJ-Lz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LwnLd-00069i-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:03:29 +0000 Original-Received: from static-71-168-37-170.hag.east.verizon.net ([71.168.37.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:03:29 +0000 Original-Received: from ndbecker2 by static-71-168-37-170.hag.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:03:29 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.emacs.devel Original-Lines: 4 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static-71-168-37-170.hag.east.verizon.net User-Agent: KNode/0.99.01 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110417 Archived-At: I noticed that running a python script that outputs very very long lines gave horrible screen updating performance. The same data when written with short lines was OK.