Re: Message goto signature

[Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@gmail.com>]

Nikolaj Schumacher <me@nschum.de> writes:

> Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@gmail.com> wrote:  > This works for
> followup: > > (defadvice gnus-summary-followup (after followup-sig 
>> activate)(progn 
> (message-goto-signature)(previous-line)(previous-line))) > > And this
> for reply: > > (defadvice gnus-summary-reply-with-original (after
> reply-sig > activate)(progn
> (message-goto-signature)(previous-line)(previous-line))) > > I dont
> know if there is a better way than previous-line.
>
> previous-line should be fine in this case, but the advice is
> unneccessary (and always potentially dangerous).
>
> The cleanest way is to just define a new command:
>
> (defun message-goto-before-signature () "Move point before the
> beginning of the message signature separator."  (interactive)
> (message-goto-signature) (forward-line -1))
>
>
> regards,
> Nikolaj Schumacher
>
>

yes, but how to automatically call the function. Can you explain why the
advice is dangerous? It seems to be reasonable in this context.


-- 
 important and urgent problems of the technology of today are no longer the satisfactions of the primary needs or of archetypal wishes, but the reparation of the evils and damages by the technology of yesterday.  ~Dennis Gabor, Innovations:  Scientific, Technological and Social, 1970