In article , Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >Xah wrote: >> Thanks. Quite complicated i don't understand. That seems c source. > >Just look at the structure. I think you can guess what is going on from >that. > >> there's some suggestion about your emacsw32 site. >> >> • drop the name to just EmacsW32. As opposed to Emacs+EmacsW32. > >Thanks, but I have struggled quite a bit with that one. There has been a >lot of misunderstandings and because of that I prefer Emacs+EmacsW32. > >> • redo the entry page so it's simply a site for EmacsW32, as a pre- >> compiled emacs distro for MS Windows. With this message simple. Then >> links to separate pages about features, source code, explanation of >> patch, on reason to use, change log, etc. > >You mean the page > > http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/Emacs.html > >Yes, it is out of sync so to say now. Thanks. > > > ------- and on sunday, 7sept08: The point is that, when user goes to your site, http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/EmacsW32.html she can immediately get the idea that this is a pre-compiled emacs distro for Windows with ease to use in mind. Then, she can click on the big download button to try it out. If she's a tech geeker, she can easily check whether there's patch she can dowload, or other info. [Need updating? re http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/EmacsW32.html: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:16:57 GMT Content-Type: text/html Connection: close Server: Apache Last-Modified: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:16:24 GMT ETag: "2496a8a-c7b4-4845b4a8" Content-Length: 51124 ] Aquamac or Carbon Emacs' website are good examples of this approach. nu.emacs.help #166768 (548 + 237 more) From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" [2] Re: Emacsw32 website suggestion [Re: Behavior of M-x and A-x] Date: Tue Aug 12 10:08:25 EDT 2008 Lines: 26 Xah wrote: > Thanks. Quite complicated i don't understand. That seems c source. Just look at the structure. I think you can guess what is going on from that. > there's some suggestion about your emacsw32 site. > > â^@¢ drop the name to just EmacsW32. As opposed to Emacs+EmacsW32. Thanks, but I have struggled quite a bit with that one. There has been a lot of misunderstandings and because of that I prefer Emacs+EmacsW32. > â^@¢ redo the entry page so it's simply a site for EmacsW32, as a pre- > compiled emacs distro for MS Windows. With this message simple. Then > links to separate pages about features, source code, explanation of > patch, on reason to use, change log, etc. You mean the page http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/Emacs.html Yes, it is out of sync so to say now. Thanks. [Yes indeed: re: http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/Emacs.html HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:19:28 GMT Content-Type: text/html Connection: close Server: Apache Last-Modified: Thu, 17 May 2007 02:50:08 GMT ETag: "6d6959-1e69-464bc2e0" Content-Length: 7785 ] That is, are these things ok to use, or do you still have some things that NEED (BADLY NEED) to be done? Thanks, David