From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: files in emacs/lisp/language/ not byte compiled Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:55:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200807040059.m640xuuC018632@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215201386 9457 80.91.229.12 (4 Jul 2008 19:56:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 19:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 21:57:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KErP0-0006rI-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:57:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59972 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KErO9-0003e4-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KErO4-0003cv-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KErO3-0003cj-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37477 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KErO3-0003cg-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:58304) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KErO3-0002l0-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:56:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KErNh-0000GL-LC; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:55:45 -0400 X-Spook: unclassified ASPIC Leuken-Baden halcon Mena Comirex X-Ran: bO2vk1>#fD$&yT[s{d+b>)~z=d^9$N[}df?e=:z#UYSl`6^tw4&th^F|J1IT:G~ (Kenichi Handa's message of "Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:47:32 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100354 Archived-At: >> The reason to change is that when doing "make recompile" in emacs/lisp >> there are a lot of lines printed about files not being byte compiled. >> This scrolls up legitimate warnings/errors and it is easy to not see them... I never use recompile, but I think `make compile-main' should have the same effect, not complain about files with no-byte-compile, be parallelizable, and also better in terms of compiling each file in a clean environment. The only possible advantage to recompile would seem to be the progmodes/cc-mode.elc explicit rule, for cc mode weirdness.