From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Lilja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Still cannot build native windows version of emacs 23.* Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:38:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47A6F0BA.7020806@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202272762 3469 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2008 04:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:39:22 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 05:39:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMc4Q-0002aN-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:39:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMc3y-0002E6-A0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMc3t-0002Dp-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMc3r-0002Dc-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMc3r-0002DZ-H7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMc3q-0005Zh-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JMc3i-00061s-KV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:38:54 +0000 Original-Received: from cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se ([85.194.49.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:38:54 +0000 Original-Received: from mindcooler by cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:38:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88324 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii skrev: >> From: Eric Lilja >> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:22:50 +0100 >> >> I'm running the bootstrap with the altered makefile right now on a fresh >> checkout, but I'm not sure I altered the line correctly. Should it be: >> .el.elc: >> $(RUNEMACS) --eval "(message \"%s\" load-path)" $< > > No, it should be > > .el.elc: > $(RUNEMACS) --eval "(message \"%s\" load-path)" -f batch-byte-compile $< > > > > Hmm, what you quoted looks odd, heh. Anyway, here are what I hope are the relevant lines from the bootstrap: mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory `c:/blandat/editors/emacs/cvsemacs/emacs/admin/unidata' "../../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -Q --multibyte -batch --eval "(message \"%s\" load-path)" -f batch-byte-compile unidata-gen.el Cannot open load file: encoded-kb mingw32-make[2]: *** [unidata-gen.elc] Error 255 mingw32-make[2]: Leaving directory `c:/blandat/editors/emacs/cvsemacs/emacs/admin/unidata' mingw32-make[1]: [unidatagen-SH] Error 2 (ignored) Let me know if I should post the complete bootstrap log again.