From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: yzhh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: recording-elisp.el - try recording commands as elisp code Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:40:46 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194241286 10949 80.91.229.12 (5 Nov 2007 05:41:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 05:41:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 05 06:41:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IouiF-0006UP-9o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:41:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ioui4-0004d3-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ioui1-0004cy-Ph for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ioui0-0004ck-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ioui0-0004ch-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iouhz-0000Bq-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iouhn-0004PW-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:40:59 +0000 Original-Received: from 211.90.238.185 ([211.90.238.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:40:59 +0000 Original-Received: from yezonghui by 211.90.238.185 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:40:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.90.238.185 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82542 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > IOW, consider promoting some of the design discussion you are having now > to interactive user choices. Just a suggestion to keep in mind. I have no > idea how feasible this is. I agree with you on offering choices to users, both custom options and recording time interactions. So we are supposed to discuss what choices to offer. Allow me repeat them here (to make it clearer): 1. three choices for recording one isearch session: a. Record the last isearch item as a constant string search b. Record all successful isearch item as constant string searches c. Record all interactions, (especially) including yanking into the search string. 2. two choices for recording minibuffer interactions: a. Totally ignore them, recording only the final command (this is for M-x interactions, I haven't thought clearly about others) b. Record all interactions so that we replay everything including yanking into the minibuffer. 3. two choices for recording case-fold-search value: a. Totally ignore. b. Record (and replay) case-fold value in-use at start of recording, and every toggle-case-fold command during that. Please note that I have also expressed the "maybe" infeasibility of choices 1.c and 2.b (given currently available commands). I would deeply appreciate if anyone suggest solutions. -- regards, yzhh