From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: yzhh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recording-elisp.el - try recording commands as elisp code Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:57:59 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87k5p05qsy.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194062343 18300 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2007 03:59:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 03:59:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 03 04:59:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IoAA5-0006Lh-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:59:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoA9v-0004HA-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoA9N-0003ei-Mh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoA9M-0003cL-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoA9L-0003c0-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoA9L-0001fi-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IoA9F-0004f3-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:58:13 +0000 Original-Received: from 211.90.238.185 ([211.90.238.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:58:13 +0000 Original-Received: from yezonghui by 211.90.238.185 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:58:13 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.90.238.185 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82398 Archived-At: Juri Linkov wrote: > I think it is enough to convert the isearch exit event with the > last search string to the calls of search-forward, search-backward, > re-search-forward and re-search-backward. Maybe you are right, since the recorded code is meant to be modified. And there are word-searches, isearch-case-fold-search that should be considered. Can we setup a vote for a policy about this (balance between simplicity and correctness)? -- regards, yzhh