From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59622: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Regression in Eshell's handling of escaped newlines Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 21:47:23 -0800 Message-ID: References: <90faf628-390d-1094-2fcb-e6a23ac46da8@gmail.com> <83v8mrbpf7.fsf@gnu.org> <3d78b158-5fde-d4c0-0e9a-cb05e09bed6e@gmail.com> <83359u9g9h.fsf@gnu.org> <9b18ac1f-04b3-63c9-56c0-84233f849d5d@gmail.com> <83v8mn49sj.fsf@gnu.org> <1335dd36-a50b-e03b-670b-58b1e08cc979@gmail.com> <838rjj3x1e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="913"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 59622@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 08 06:48:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p39lu-000Acy-J5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 06:48:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p39lb-00036o-2M; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p39lK-000365-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p39lK-0003Ze-83 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p39lK-0003xv-4n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 05:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59622 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 59622-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59622.167047845515228 (code B ref 59622); Thu, 08 Dec 2022 05:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59622) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2022 05:47:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p39ks-0003xY-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:41780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p39ko-0003xF-2s for 59622@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:47:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 130so454471pfu.8 for <59622@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:47:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4J+mH8RhjFvDlpVqvVvlUmxmORlZoFMdboeSE8ydsVY=; b=Mj+QWrivkBtHjw3AWBFbgyCFK6LyproLH5CvvPJAIe1atZdEVzWEykKx+aVmse2JmS 30cQCNh2B93xF3xYxLKXOKioVKVa089ljhhhqJoVR8JpSvMC+vaSdLRN0dZt371u9/es SYFvtPElHJUr0EByg0lrUlefJ/gWr7UVNyWFOotxFMmD8PK3neHxUoaiiG5W26/FHEqP jqYy9Pvt6gFAqvMeEq+ylcu38b1U3vCcB7yR1gNZXReyoHYlC7kjMaoMOlT5mlfiOPuJ AyLVEoewjAoVeeOJA7fnM/bZr0XJahBwxC8t0Zjg88yrs3HzArpzP8Fp8DHdxsreu40P d+SQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4J+mH8RhjFvDlpVqvVvlUmxmORlZoFMdboeSE8ydsVY=; b=6s3ev34yNAFsa047Y3/HaK4Vq7Kdxkm0FsTJseBzQUFViZb8BP29oG+dT1WYVSM733 OJQqhvdPh0nYgYUHrEaBB+pE5GDPZOkWX+R/PwqHfDUW/zhkmRgUj+uPx4dCAawqzaEL mjSu096qpMfGanrLIZTiRhaPjt1jrXv6cxYhmrWqFVthOemnetH1iSX1Xn2C4jLVF/P6 IPXu64IOLRp3ZD+lTHcylBJJcF4K4+wIPE3ZgBAQrrfcgmP2Y9arhhfCmDXcatmuCspG dh861LKlwGLAwjP4KBsRZpVPmjT9GW3Zbbl6BDyb1dOin0MTr7qey/3mAI832RRHlHoe zvcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnWs///WR/vczfWKKW+FqVG4df1jmRBX35+mz6n9ltywQrvVkXs pQRJARi1aL6af7H9K0he7YypT/bXHjQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6JltL+VIq+V9qqayUBKuQoma5atBcG9Augi/iQ1Wn1o8RHD9pmpOYol7MKHbsc0PslsKCehw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6286:0:b0:478:c84a:ade1 with SMTP id w128-20020a636286000000b00478c84aade1mr12846100pgb.66.1670478444084; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:47:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x12-20020a17090abc8c00b002132f3e71c6sm2037239pjr.52.2022.12.07.21.47.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:47:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <838rjj3x1e.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250240 Archived-At: On 12/7/2022 10:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:57:59 -0800 >> Cc: 59622@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Jim Porter >> >> This worked properly in Emacs 28 and is broken in 29. I'm not 100% sure >> which patch regressed it, but my guess is patch 0003 in bug#54227, which >> was merged in March. > > Then we must fix the regression on the emacs-29 branch. > > Thanks. Thanks, that sounds right to me too. I've merged this (just the first patch with the fix) to the emacs-29 branch as cf5ce14a6b442649426003fed8dc02ee7edca914. I'll leave this open until I merge the small cleanup patch to master once my first patch has gotten there.