From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7548: [FIXED] bookmark-default-handler wrong documentation Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:35:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r5dsd6nw.fsf@red-bean.com> <87hbejc4ir.fsf@red-bean.com> <83hbeiu49i.fsf@gnu.org> <87y67ubtwh.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292201754 1678 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2010 00:55:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 7548@debbugs.gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 13 01:55:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwhe-00019y-9K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:55:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60454 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRwhd-0005PH-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:55:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57782 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRwhX-0005P0-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwhV-00047j-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwhV-00047f-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:55:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwIl-0000uz-T2; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:30:04 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7548 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7548-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7548.12922001653464 (code B ref 7548); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7548) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2010 00:29:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwI8-0000tn-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwI6-0000tZ-4b for 7548@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:29:22 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39936) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRwNz-00026Y-0j; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:35:27 -0500 X-Spook: Project Monarch JSOFC3IP Leuken-Baden AUTODIN X-Ran: SV|LrEI5|?Rq/$=`5MN_E)485B)Dgm-ueT=W9P|_@y6_f%{6=w}<0dV@F@XZM4X,4PSHYo X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87y67ubtwh.fsf@red-bean.com> (Karl Fogel's message of "Sun\, 12 Dec 2010 15\:47\:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:30:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42467 Archived-At: >>We generally do it the other way around: changes that are safe for the >>release branch should be committed there, and they will then be merged >>to the trunk (unless you instruct otherwise, see below). > > Is this documented somewhere? admin/notes/bzr