From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33442: 26.1.90; Cairo side-by-side windows scrolling fix should be cherry-picked Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:22:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h8gc412q.fsf@gmail.com> <83wop7ivw2.fsf@gnu.org> <83in0riscq.fsf@gnu.org> <87va4qaorj.fsf@gmail.com> <1bf2b358-3ac2-46bb-f298-5c115149dea0@yandex.ru> <875zwpligs.fsf@gmail.com> <6976af8a-8fbf-da98-d770-55224a7736af@yandex.ru> <871s7dl2xg.fsf@gmail.com> <08133af3-3f70-1634-e162-ae6cfe26767f@yandex.ru> <83k1l5go6l.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542900072 21921 195.159.176.226 (22 Nov 2018 15:21:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:21:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 Cc: ari.roponen@gmail.com, 33442@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 22 16:21:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqmw-0005ZN-Ul for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:21:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqp3-0000g9-II for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqou-0000g3-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqoq-0007BX-7a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqoq-0007BA-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqop-0000Kl-SY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:23:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33442 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33442-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33442.15429001601242 (code B ref 33442); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33442) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2018 15:22:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqoS-0000Jy-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com ([209.85.208.49]:34511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPqoQ-0000Jl-U7 for 33442@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 10:22:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id b3so8032623ede.1 for <33442@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:22:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E2rhsXHhMQxB8DE+B1a7busiU+QaelG/dF8pvla0JW0=; b=PoCAwidW1PrBErCYr0ApG9WkgbxfUWlQtpKPRIAN2p8DiWhqkRkkrXYFBYT9Q0gjSk vMu5iWbbgEL0RaP6vFW5ptVtAqbFhFRcRi0Hb/UQSPk76yRRYJyBmZPGvgtQhTBbWqUo Fmy7Eq+LagQXo40WEPXEDU8DFYV7/D+PRfwKd794oMx6ifuVR38T1ELtudG9yV0Wo9Qv ReyrykiCZjb70PkLX65yCi+szC4U99D0BxudwK2A5WQKGwOM+zobyMuWu9E1s+OHiiTY uTpUfNZSLYjbmdwHdOAHk7N+MjG002HW13UmZrgIg9Tqy3uH8XmV2DFtVjBXDIbdPQWh be1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E2rhsXHhMQxB8DE+B1a7busiU+QaelG/dF8pvla0JW0=; b=lu5w4bzz/wP29bkKEEqWjPSuP4bUYA/2ZSl0kQsqZOZ8/WyBZ46u5YbHgULxil3sz3 xQHYvvrXr6R70yv9vJSNe6Zr3kXZmiX8v6ll1InlXZ1LDNdqAhK8FjV5yCKQQ5AQsxjF Gxwgl/dL6nDQACwQDUHIq1iTxDMfzO/Ycq6iJ3jDei4IbO6wfl2IwN9mVL42hF+DM1zI BG/OeQ/+rNmWDLhTDFhnC/YjQvyjlsaWzhtBrcS3NM3AQuAtHrZijoQA2v7EKIfOmq+L VI9zFoqDhLHTR1WrXlpz/RkfwOLTs0c2gdxd33z6YGmPfsus1pAuKsr1x97ds9djt1ic cfwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZcusBd6w1c49StzFO4IXpvooR/J631p57G4jYB+JilrKblKdkZ chVo4BaQtQkv4faDqxxvoJ3K3Ylq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Vjg5bLU4d1AcqLeoB/RrCmhA/wqXoWon5VEQmJ+jHOtjgnWUxssfDigwWIH0t5Pk288pGbVg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:86b7:: with SMTP id r52mr9428449eda.227.1542900152757; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:22:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a27sm11479518eda.65.2018.11.22.07.22.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:22:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k1l5go6l.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152675 Archived-At: On 22.11.2018 16:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > How many users will agree to demote the DPI just to have the Cairo > build working? IOW, is the above a viable solution, or is it > something many users will regard as unacceptable? I think so. The toolbar buttons and the scrollbar handle are simply smaller, and a lot of hardcore users disable them anyway. The font size or rendering quality don't seem to be affected by the scaling factor. Still, some users won't like it, or will simply be confused if they have to hunt for "GDK_SCALE=1 emacs" in the PROBLEMS file, so we have to fix that sooner a later, too. But it seems to be a separate bug, not one we've already seen reported. And, judging from the past bug reports, problems like this are relatively easy to fix.