On 2016-08-29 09:17, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> The patch below is supposed to change Emacs such that if the file's
>>> >> timestamp has changed, but the contents is still the same, it doesn't
>>> >> prompt the user about a supersession-threat.
>>> >> Any objection?

>> > This sounds like a neat feature! Are you sure you want (point-min) and
>> > (point-max) rather than 1 and (buffer-size), though?

> I hate this assumption that point-min is 1 (so much so that my own
> local Emacs has point-min set to 12345678).

Sorry, maybe you misunderstood me, or maybe I misunderstood you.  Where do you see an assumption that point-min is 1?
Also, why not just introduce a function buffer-min, instead of the (save-restriction) + (widen) dance?

Clément.