From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Shift Tab should move backward in help buffers Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:00:39 +0900 Message-ID: References: <42BEB2F6.9010409@student.lu.se> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119867638 1263 80.91.229.2 (27 Jun 2005 10:20:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 12:20:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dmqin-00042J-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmqqP-0003Gb-4B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmqVa-0004qs-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:06:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DmqVZ-0004qH-KV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:06:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DmqVY-0004q1-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:06:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.198] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DmqUB-0005F5-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so262849wri for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:00:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qWlcX1pMuZ40Xdzi11xyAVU0kkHhfE7yg6mFylVxSfLM89n1G7hFVzIw2j/adhoe8pc/eLhVaA4LxfuxHPlt4gy0H91NPXnNDTpp3NrbpVfEWuDcDIdzxwaF3I5FdMVBhOGivHbjs2s7GgzphcbJBKYll1Jrcrpl0NWQEWz9t7s= Original-Received: by 10.54.59.32 with SMTP id h32mr86666wra; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.31 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39643 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39643 On 6/27/05, Jason Rumney wrote: > We'd have to check the > codebase for S-tab bindings and change them to bind backtab instead to > maintain consistency. Yes, but I think we'd have to do that anyway -- the current state of things is sort of ridiculous. I definitely vote for centralizing the mappings and standardizing on for the various mode-specific keymaps. [I'm not even sure that maintaining a default aliasing of S-TAB -> TAB is very important -- this feature is handy for the alphabetic keys for several reasons, but I don't think it matters very much for keys like TAB.] -Miles --=20 Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.