From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan... Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:12:28 +0900 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109766142 18828 80.91.229.2 (2 Mar 2005 12:22:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 13:22:21 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6SrY-0005n1-Qo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:22:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6TAJ-0002xg-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:41:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6Swf-0005e5-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:27:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D6Swb-0005cL-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:27:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6Swb-0005bS-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:27:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.197] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D6SiM-0008QE-2d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:12:30 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so188563wri for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 04:12:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=F5eFwuZ4ogyTmVwkiEuXe/IKJA87F5WP1JaonCwyYBfwiPyZ7rVEFjBgDRGvuxdwehwuXj8x/67OpeR534y6FjhYjlkt6yIDtQlVoRzUw5KnU8HIKPAAMDI9CBu+E/b3Kx5pxY9lPQUmYBHGi24v240REW0Wv7hVe6wAfevITP0= Original-Received: by 10.54.20.50 with SMTP id 50mr42333wrt; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 04:12:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.70 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 04:12:28 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Kim F. Storm" In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34064 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34064 On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:44:27 +0100, Kim F. Storm wrote: > > But I think it should an explicit decision to that effect. > > I don't remember an explicit decision was made before you enabled the > xasserts. So why is an explicit decision needed to disable them? I think an explicit decision should be made one way or the other. At the time I enabled it, that was not clear the degree to which it would be a contentious issue (I had been using it personally for ages without any notable problems, and I _did_ ask before I enabled it by default) -- however, now it is. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.