From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 21.4 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:23:54 +0900 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107942407 11937 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 09:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 10:46:46 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyoQd-00027w-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:46:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyof8-0006uO-JX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 05:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyoHy-0002N0-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:37:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyoHs-0002Jn-66 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:37:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyoHp-0002In-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:37:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.197] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cyo4h-0005D2-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so114851wri for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 01:23:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=kTtrXaXZfgjDGIfixd3kK2U8ffk7fUicVuIiPiNYgAi3/O8Ud/YBLNTVCDNw5PQo45W8xbbm/WEqHQeaZMpCnW0aw8j3dsI49jwmlYYEliRGA46tsxjVIMvc8jTn70LhWk/di9kVcEqQ8Egspmostyngk7NhcQTcqslun9+VX3s= Original-Received: by 10.54.59.6 with SMTP id h6mr210442wra; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 01:23:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.70 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 01:23:54 -0800 (PST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33124 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33124 On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:10:28 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > > I have made an Emacs 21.4 release with a single security fix. > > We noticed. > > I am always a day or so behind in sending out mail about anything. > You can have a long discussion before I have a chance even to see > the beginning of it. But in some cases you'd probably be better > off if you waited to hear from me. My first thought when I read Juan's message that he had found a new 21.4 tar file was "OMG, gnu.org's been hacked again!" Luckily it wasn't true... -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.