From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting more info on a variable in Customize buffers Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:26:35 +0900 Message-ID: References: <200501022044.j02KiBL08651@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104831391 10508 80.91.229.6 (4 Jan 2005 09:36:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 04 10:36:18 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cll6v-0002KB-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:36:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CllI7-0007Fx-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:47:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll9l-0006TZ-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:39:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll9i-0006T6-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:39:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cll9h-0006SH-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.204] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ClkxY-0004i7-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 04:26:36 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 49so595958wri for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 01:26:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YPe0HmWiPgGINe3ztZCd/f9YGrRbY++L/a/O6xJiLQuarrswbUdhB2cltnymIAvPh66xjNJZXgwgvE10k7shlnPPtg5z1L2SnlaRX5YEHoklInN3A+OlnLQKSZ7/1wZAL+9i/6ZNVK2XSpnH6LjKigmRCMxTlsAzFpPdF1tc86o= Original-Received: by 10.54.19.32 with SMTP id 32mr24497wrs; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 01:26:35 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.78 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:26:35 -0800 (PST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31804 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31804 > Or maybe just remove it, I have never heard of anyone who ever used > this feature. I've used it; sometimes a custom definition is so fucked up that looking at the lisp expr provides a useful clue what's going on. [Why would anybody tell you if they used it anyway?] -Miles