From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38665: [PATCH] Add nosqueeze for fill-paragraph Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 13:51:04 +1200 Message-ID: References: <16f1b2142c1.db34a11d477759.6290031006911449352@aoeu2code.com> <83ftbw80yx.fsf@gnu.org> <9e408bcd5bdfe3a4cae46564ce1cf4b7@webmail.orcon.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="87084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: 38665@debbugs.gnu.org, jefferson@aoeu2code.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 21 03:52:07 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaNT-000MZY-Ki for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 03:52:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaNS-0003bs-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaNO-0003bm-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaNN-0004ks-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaNN-00063N-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 01:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38665 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38665-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38665.159002587923211 (code B ref 38665); Thu, 21 May 2020 01:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38665) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 May 2020 01:51:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54847 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaMg-00062J-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:35403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaMd-000627-V7 for 38665@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=57740 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbaMS-0007no-Mv; Thu, 21 May 2020 13:51:05 +1200 Original-Received: from ip-101-53-216-155.kinect.net.nz ([101.53.216.155]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 21 May 2020 13:51:04 +1200 In-Reply-To: <9e408bcd5bdfe3a4cae46564ce1cf4b7@webmail.orcon.net.nz> X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180695 Archived-At: On 2020-05-20 11:59, Phil Sainty wrote: > I may have some more-recent local WIP on my other machine; > I'll have a look for that later. Having checked this, I do have a fairly sizeable WIP diff against my initial patch, and it all still applies with only one minor context change. That's all I've checked though -- I haven't tried to work out exactly where I got to with the changes, or which problems still needed to be figured out. The additional changes are very much WIP and messy, so there's not a nice patch to put anywhere; but if someone is interested in actively working on this feature in the near future, and didn't mind picking through some mess, then let me know. -Phil