On 29/09/17 21:37, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> On 2017-09-25 13:48, Phil Sainty wrote:
>> Thinking on this further, it might be even better to use 
>> pre-command-hook
>> to establish whether the pre-command position of point is equal to the
>> process mark, and then act conditionally on that in post-command-hook,
>> so that if the pre-command point did not already match the process mark,
>> we do *not* forcibly move it to the process mark afterwards.
> 
> Do you have a patch along these lines?

I've found a little time to work on this some more.

New patch attached, with the aforementioned changes.

I think the remaining task would be to add user options to disable
the new behaviours, as some users might object to them?


-Phil