From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58839: [Patch] Re: bug#58839: 29.0.50; project-kill-buffer fails when Eglot is running Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 23:15:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sfj8umwb.fsf@posteo.net> <87edur3lil.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65f3j40.fsf@posteo.net> <213f3549-de4e-25a7-5e27-d13893e557bc@yandex.ru> <87zgdfwkle.fsf@gmail.com> <8e31a89d-e35e-6dd0-a8e3-f0b9684c8bfa@yandex.ru> <87v8o3wgq1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilk2x1si.fsf@gmail.com> <871qqq7l9p.fsf@posteo.net> <87eduqwekz.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn8invbx.fsf@posteo.net> <877d0iw8iq.fsf@gmail.com> <837d0hhlke.fsf@gnu.org> <46ff0065-5645-ef1e-2621-242fb6a73f98@yandex.ru> <838rkxfep9.fsf@gnu.org> <834jvlf5o4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37529"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cc: philipk@posteo.net, 58839@debbugs.gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 22:16:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opFfW-0009cA-Ux for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 22:16:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opFf2-0005s2-Do; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opFf1-0005rn-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opFf0-0002pZ-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opFf0-0008Pl-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58839.166716452532300 (code B ref 58839); Sun, 30 Oct 2022 21:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2022 21:15:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opFeP-0008Ot-80 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:34304) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opFeN-0008Oh-3B for 58839@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id k8so13555911wrh.1 for <58839@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s66vI+iGALnCuUXaDP3IW2oUHV+PT9mgDpsnLSTdD8U=; b=GvPII1hXmlut2RKJrBsETWRkrdP7j/X+6oPUMoaOokNR/TtaOl5UZ3pEVQOIi394qA 2gGxtn+MPHRNxilpH3wItj7XV0Pc8vbD5nxnGfZyJWlcxqrHI17N/Bq4u/y6KCaAkFy8 BcN4WSL39scHA4ZquW9TJJiJ9A7VLmhgsWLjXccZRsvGrTps++Rn06wFooWBatxWAWck uGW9mgE08r6A9R5QrGHG6K/k2qza+kw1ioKwcDbrtp2TytC8P5vmbPPDzfsCqpuodaM7 9ufZ/hFzrUmh5dUIobSWL3JfBD4uTyfWJMacrs4sb4mdxIvMcytrh43sXNSi6xJqXBWz tJPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=s66vI+iGALnCuUXaDP3IW2oUHV+PT9mgDpsnLSTdD8U=; b=tCO69SusOXUg7/TXIykDg0aroHRurmMbRdEi3kTZ+nY14qbQoVizUhWitl+SWNhRic +oltV4ZQEc0/RCG1ZRC1zYQXxKcehRUNaZ+wHw7QB9O9KslB9T4dtjEurIqkgQMYViir 3E3eWogUvtTiMcio3iNiOyDLgwdqOAm+saw/19cNi6eEoA1+TIfMEBIdiYFGE5NoQZ9M hY/Qct3JHmijRNOyekQRRLG5XxmmwnYQZl/FpRkA5Q7rVsRScDa0tihuUGqWISEVjVZR x0K86QOCkv/lClSXi+reL7+93LhIe+K3HxTzKg0MGyYTsjDUjKrSAUVxThh/EmwMxr5e 13ig== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0qvkAzXYpfaRMVe4ikiT7YnP6OVLw+nJ3jKqgrQHXiNOS5Ka/I C0kgT5/raOozZecGzERzwdg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7DZ5EbLllAJm1r91BM+Q/0TKabNevgfbW/hGJ3jtbWjgMbeGFJPefkw5807TMpU+Wr6pnE+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58d7:0:b0:236:6c53:6123 with SMTP id o23-20020a5d58d7000000b002366c536123mr6004607wrf.719.1667164517200; Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g4-20020a5d5544000000b002366fb99cdasm5097725wrw.50.2022.10.30.14.15.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Oct 2022 14:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <834jvlf5o4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246649 Archived-At: On 30.10.2022 21:54, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > You don't need to be defensive, I did not intend to restart the > argument. I just wanted to inform João that your opinion was and > remains that non-file visiting buffers should be part of the project, > that's all. Thanks. >> The issue Joao is having, however, is with particular "hidden" >> non-file-visiting buffers (in fundamental-mode). And here the argument >> could be made both ways. > He was making a more general argument about buffers that don't visit > files, AFAIU. I wanted to inform him that this idea was already > considered in the past. I don't know if that was his point. To quote: Yes, I think some earmuffed buffers can clearly belong to projects. Others probably not. You haven't seen me complain about project-kill-buffers killing the *EGLOT events* buffer, for example 😉