From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_R=c3=b6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Python interactive navigation around nested functions Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:28:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lh21eq5c.fsf@secretsauce.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466411214 4596 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2016 08:26:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 08:26:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 10:26:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEuXb-0002KS-8i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:26:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEuXZ-0004ZK-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 04:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEuUj-0002p7-I1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 04:23:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEuUg-0002ta-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 04:23:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:56563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEuUf-0002sv-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 04:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.178.35] ([77.12.77.196]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MZKsW-1ayTZI30gu-00L0AY for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:23:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:tfj2BzihysVSP3BVqco9aDQI0VcCizMPkbhcqcNK/P/caCSeHSL Ncoff1qP/3r9ojXPiMo3iAKuJ9bwIGaxcyEGhwGMmKbsi0uKEpL1jPuzTNYw0R3Pl+X7+Ud q2+WzpIPlIRAp8dG/VYB2hESYrvk8+LnUR+b7vo9dtbUv/JfD6lGwoOvHWNs3cNcRrTY9u5 oP8YsXBe9TkVcM8VsAZbA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:I/AMFMehnyQ=:gxSS71ho8VXduDVNDGGyBe JbgQOuuD/Vchy87g86LALP9Y1+kBKNlozft9p2zEp3V5RKaqnMXB0nuslIXhmpKHEV9vhNvlD Ohphd9LelRjErgdrXm531hDnz3cnKNMpFT+EUixMKsnNKIb6HzycKH8IoxfSbraOcbp6DeWqZ pkQ+/6pQaI36yYaYXq2fekbz2/e3iAZXMRjulhLdFLFvCfW3tTUlNZtrfNcKsu8bGZBUL88w2 9Z4jw0C42KkLsjesT4+b639dsst90uvEFQLOyPTzYPVeoxztEAxweHWCnRIf1o7rbXkFl1m1v /w9vxWufBWhQ0/M0iuDgK8jluQgrl7JUe9zP04w1LWLozEri1fHsMhr5Hqx9V9Q2vtV5y7LWc dmT/ShhgOqV6z9l+Gfre6KzrxpIyn+W554zr5LPJ6O2ywtcasiVZ/Z+dcdpGnNQ3OeltIf340 by3hqemhlmrqi2WbM4uEiMsW7RPOxU0PaNTzRTFvzOCIF3Ko1Zep8q62AOpGZxkfPhJbXe3FA qSXoGpjcHh7x6asanTK1onLbgWu7QljijoQBh+QtRLxosfgM/xS4k53VnsR9Z5eXJI+gKhJ9B gu9wHc6dlPEtErF/wrolaWEUFDdDHCTDtGBPo45hJtplfECuuorz5cO5EvGvtkRFUvJRb5/vB j4ST0af9TkhO4eC/bUPkPd+oMgZSTDkJcRLmpOgvsB8zVasiYqa3P3l33aylUU6oS2oBNZkOq MKaR5BhOxEn/6+oY X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.126.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204571 Archived-At: On 20.06.2016 09:34, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> It's not about jumping to enclosing function --which would mean upwards-- >> but reaching the AST level entry node. > I don't know what you mean by "the AST level entry node". > >> This is a bug, noted for python-mode.el too: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-mode/+bug/1594263 > So both python-modes behave identically in this respect. That would not > be surprising if the behavior you don't like is the one usually > considered as right. > > > Start and end of a functions definition is not about like or don't like. Also not about "usually considered".