From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 9X compatibility Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:26:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <83ljddg0w9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BAE867D.3030404@gmail.com> <4BAE9ED4.6070900@t-online.de> <4BAEA525.20709@gmail.com> <83iq8ggbcp.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxxs3311.fsf@telefonica.net> <83eij430fc.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq8g2p9t.fsf@telefonica.net> <838w9c2nm5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269815207 27666 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2010 22:26:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 29 00:26:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nw0wL-0000NT-Sw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:26:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48366 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nw0wL-00050n-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nw0wD-0004xs-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46402 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nw0wC-0004vS-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nw0wB-0008Jk-Iu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:26:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:56634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nw0wB-0008JS-E4; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 18:26:31 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1001132bwz.26 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:26:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=H1/bdROp/dlJ+j9wxKCTaGAZ1ZX2QCu1vEwZMEaXhgU=; b=OyL71n1WjXIGjSw1wTxVPJXG8ymryRmKpmCcCUqtFKxYJ5Ke9jJASneabUzAmY7p8H /wjClCrOKaSsOCxlA7ONNJKHdYoHOI8nFKbwQHRtA+l47al8icLrZRW508y3/cgSkICK nOCGV8Fk1YvtECvY8vS2AXZ8115eGU4JKknjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=qPHItpCi28wOTQeGC26sZBDtZefh30Ol/SNesnTDw3Ui+Ds849F0Yrdq2UbPjN4jNG dBjOrzA36A9VAAUSsebeAkrOb/eKHR44yoIi3RBi6dCcVBIx6epaN2E/twz2KZ2GzZ3f j8DpDDzqvmLzpT/OvLx6qGNXEHcA0suOBHNz8= Original-Received: by 10.204.156.9 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:26:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838w9c2nm5.fsf@gnu.org> Original-Received: by 10.204.5.217 with SMTP id 25mr2204564bkw.114.1269815190163; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:26:30 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122831 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 22:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > AFAIK, none of the active contributors to the > Windows port has access to a W9X system these days. Hmm, I just remembered... About a month ago I tried 23.1 (the standard binary tarball distribution) on a Windows 95 and it refused to start; had trouble loading a library. Not some uncommon library, though, but kernel32 or somesuch. Unfortunately, I have no developer tools on that computer and only occasional access to it, so I haven't been able to look into the problem. I'll try to gather more information next time, but it'd be great to have confrmation that it *does* work on W95 right now. Juanma