From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes? Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:17:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090219195720.GB5356@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235074642 7790 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2009 20:17:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 19 21:18:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LaFLy-0007AN-03 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:18:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaFKc-000531-VG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaFKW-00051o-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LaFKU-00050x-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59918 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LaFKU-00050u-Fr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f20.google.com ([209.85.219.20]:59037) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaFKU-0003x0-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:17:06 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy13 with SMTP id 13so584570ewy.18 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:17:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yX/pubsZJpztViMMw3O+eyra6RccsI2TQHG4mL+s6KU=; b=JGcDeLrPqpFKyboZwiQqE1vn+5LKEwQ0YgsmMxRwv3EHRZKApm6bxazJWhYFM+7LMX vUkvEjlEXt4fqSWfp2Dpkp3uv/zrJfwtzdQBScq8T3DVGGYLWPj6EEurHH06pAbAG2p2 PziJra/23ppGncwy94Q584jf3Fz9zx4aGVlKA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DfEnQUqI6znD12Vm7zSQH5v3BckELNQnl3v52fibAp94WeiozIAbfHMLB9UcSf3VBi 0TJt7NOPVurs1Cnuuhrh+W9W9E7A3cpAnGto5BPzt+U/HL16kVjWTHBFtYQzDc9PXCVn akqURGOzY6NTZLHswE6skyjpU1TkowVLrDItk= Original-Received: by 10.210.120.7 with SMTP id s7mr3363904ebc.187.1235074625451; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:17:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090219195720.GB5356@muc.de> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109230 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 20:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > For point outside a defun, the behaviour in Emacs 22 was somewhat > heuristic - compile the previous defun if point is on the same line as > that defun's closing paren, else compile the following defun, if any, > else the previous defun. I think this is reasonable behaviour ;-) I'm not sure whether you find reasonable the behavior of Emacs 22, or the one I reported. I think the behavior in 22 is much more intuitive. The point is moot, though, as Stefan has already fixed the issue. Juanma