From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 03:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49601DD3.2010107@gnu.org> <49601FF7.7030500@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231036548 18445 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2009 02:35:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 02:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 04 03:36:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJIrK-0001Fs-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:36:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJIq5-0007EO-Ii for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJIpv-0007B2-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJIpv-0007Af-0x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41190 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJIpu-0007Ab-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.152]:10212) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJIpt-0004wv-5R; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so2264928ywk.66 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:35:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dfpx5hAk+ArG/LCzYcOo5KN9uXoRzA+c+KPt6f4F4/U=; b=sbdEiXSWXm1dPMm3h4RRxC1tz5eqCZzZHQ88qaU6Y52b4yEIyilJN7W8Hx8K0auO5J 29Pj/pvtFO2WG8ucxrtd021qKwTp74QpiGVsGFXLK/w6/cSneSdSg0GMDxHzx320TrJG ZQnLZPiukqDQW247Lsvb0Pma48W5E5h7Ad/KU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nxkL12gszOd9EI48o4i4roNQJ/rmPZkTuepboTHzdoVSFmM8OOuDy5KZ8XkPUfadKz lrgVbDglP/f3wpakA5sOUH6QSPvKlackKtBfwUquihqd8Mex+4wutI89WPB2YHmtkkqM W2oYIo8ekHImOsBK2msy/zQ0EWGoNoBulh9oA= Original-Received: by 10.100.227.6 with SMTP id z6mr10438312ang.120.1231036528450; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:35:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:35:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49601FF7.7030500@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107560 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 03:33, Jason Rumney wrote: > That doesn't seem like a good idea. It was a flag, there was no division. But I've already removed it. Juanma