From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:03:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230833017 2285 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2009 18:03:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 01 19:04:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LIRuN-0003kE-SH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:04:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60125 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIRt8-0002Qq-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIRt3-0002N2-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:03:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIRt2-0002ME-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54216 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIRt1-0002MB-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.152]:50429) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LIRt0-0004d5-DP; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:03:10 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so2011572ywk.66 for ; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:03:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=gMzWVyHGEyUv7yMCT8YwkS66c4XkjQZpC8xx4J+sE/I=; b=KRY5+BnzLGkDo2OV+/ymeachrl/cCs0M6n9I4IosBeGn5B9BfAUFobriBo+jukcVUV 9Sd3MdFDvUld3wkBQ81sX/GoWXoPYdd1YwLgP2wYlazTs7J9uCo9jTzpuvCptokk1tmi P1aySdWkkY470rljvoHKX18bofNJVB6Bj9RUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=T+t+fJhze0tV+Pe3jr4Oc8TXXrTO14vCvT2wGTrBdh01TF6UPrIuJepbm3rHaRLnHv 3fl9C1NAsOtAtPpUEl4wKxBsT0ayjRf64SwuXO96h6ndiRgJPldYqtnvAWVgkmeRqhPG Coo0ErefPua9iThCafjAPNyc57BuxHULeov8Q= Original-Received: by 10.100.122.12 with SMTP id u12mr9478225anc.78.1230832989299; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:03:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:03:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107507 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 13:57, dhruva wrote: > I have a shorter patch, not sure it if catches all use cases. Shorter is not an advantage per se. It is clear that using ULARGE_INTEGER works; if that's the right thing to do, we can settle on the cleanest patch afterwards. My concern is why was it done with long double in the first place. Perhaps there's some reason of back compatibility with older compilers. Juanma