From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Option to customize the -m message flag of cvs? Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:29:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49590470.4080306@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230593399 17038 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2008 23:29:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 30 00:31:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LHRZd-00027h-9M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:31:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45669 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LHRYO-0000xx-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:29:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LHRYJ-0000xs-Ri for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:29:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LHRYH-0000xg-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48186 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LHRYH-0000xd-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:29:37 -0500 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.154]:39767) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LHRYG-0005RE-0D; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so1650702yxf.66 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FQY69yAPeGqljeXvlckK+9b7Xb3dHQeAdHAbUQBoDt8=; b=hRmJ02vNMMlYsDxdndBrLTIf2XE7h+J3lcJChhRHwtNrzauKaNYJNddsAXHqNJXMYm aM/IaDUiIyFD+M+jbs5UVkbVz9sEfrZ7xNoiu8tOJPn5h3aDAVu+5Nt9iLGf+Bdtqc+y 8juHqhb1NDU7gh3F2D/vLQhSsg0uYidE3qMXc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=q/tO6ZthmzGhrBpNvCm9um/mCdFyCXCdnfaY/gk9CyJN5pmoAWZvZ9KmWT24J6yfbX 95QVTzojU6ndh25Lm0Qi5dVe+6kolaB1dShNsd0KLxbBc1Av1ZrQuvE1uJmVBeeITSHg 0Z9mLv0tf2sKEaerlJqtGZEVrku4z/EFcXtnY= Original-Received: by 10.100.37.20 with SMTP id k20mr8012605ank.5.1230593374768; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:29:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107403 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 21:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > What I don't understand is why would someone use CVSNT instead of some > other Windows port that doesn't have such a problem in -m, and thus > does not need any changes in VC. In my experience, as a CVS client on Windows it is more stable, well integrated and bug free that other implementations I've tried. It also has nice features, like built-in support for ssh (I mean, you don't have to install any ssh or PuTTY package, just CVSNT). As a server it has lots of useful features; there's a list at http://www.march-hare.com/cvsnt/newfeatures/. As for the -m "problem", it is recent, and it would be more of a problem if they had not provided ways to circumvent it; as it is now, it's a minor inconvenience. Juanma