From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug in server-start Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18758.7352.558182.931572@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200812151724.mBFHOSnS029425@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <18759.21210.387155.565065@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <200812161601.mBGG1dqw004070@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812161615.mBGGFFto004218@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812161631.mBGGV86i004284@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229446159 16901 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2008 16:49:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:49:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ulrich Mueller , Nick Roberts , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 16 17:50:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LCd7i-0005WB-VG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCd6X-0001lF-BW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCd0Y-0004cR-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:42:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCd0W-0004bE-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59022 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCd0V-0004b8-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.184]:40939) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCd0V-0000oV-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k32so2904693rnd.7 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:42:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KsrvZVwJY1ty+LklwQwFblMzjtReOwgHzIso2UVenz0=; b=k3UTOClqlvhso+yM9qeX1VA6KzKbUazlhR0nysPN8Q1A4/4hRPjgeQsAbMuZ+rppTp lS2m2rsi4UZtM1XFkeUVegGSCvnoc8cUZY1y+eb2IO9RTsZUoDJFlElF+Mj6RCKqxjYS TVUSW2xZipv8bameNPsyTDqq9y58m4t8rJI7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CG21hon5QipPSZLu4PdwM7vp6fN+SWTFSoDWoQDs/+fTBpMK1jSBkdHPWekCNjMjJI oCJWbQRJAuSsHELrM53KBh0NKSGlLrOJQw9N0kmb4VhQ2G0nYwd2TXyvulMi9uTU7B0k 06K/u6icf4z5wKCpE+ClG4QldlJuiOTNsXQDE= Original-Received: by 10.100.9.19 with SMTP id 19mr5688959ani.8.1229445770521; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:42:50 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:42:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200812161631.mBGGV86i004284@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106974 Archived-At: > Why don't you explain what part of what I wrote was unclear? The part where you consider that Server "server" is already running (while talking about server.el) is confusing but apparently you don't consider confusing Could not start daemon "server" if passed --daemon=server; or, now that I think of it, Could not start daemon "daemon" if passed --daemon=daemon. As for the "Most users won't know, nor care about that", diagnostic messages usually contain relevant information, that the user is free to ignore. We're not talking of several screenfuls of data, just server-name (which the user would benefit of knowing about). Juanma