From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs's popularity Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:58:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2103fd36-c5cd-4e8d-a74f-34697a369934@a26g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <87skop8cc7.fsf@iki.fi> <20081215210907.GB3848@groll.co.za> <87ljuh86il.fsf@iki.fi> <878wqg4alp.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229428739 15993 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2008 11:58:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Phil Carmody" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 16 13:00:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LCYaq-0003J4-Cp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:00:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCYZe-0004Rv-6N for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCYZG-0004QZ-M3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LCYZG-0004QA-CI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46036 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LCYZG-0004Pw-4T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.152]:56036) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LCYZF-0003gQ-QT for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so1307061ywk.66 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=TuaWMwnmMj6SE8WtqIWCYDJyI9XXSobwU844braiyrc=; b=DVqZy9gWGbeOhmQFmsVkZOZHwXmJjP+LXV4/N4v5nVeML8QBo/aGv+hQJ68ufwOKnV k06uXm+e4S55tujksuXGExG1b5/hMtGpDeEG/iFa72BP0KbaqR80AIa2nyp0/oSswFtn VcWSLXytg2hiLVVGGZ5jxRsEcgzaPkSrkNQog= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tIMz0YI40G6w7rknIzVjW8zkPigUI+FjMZ7S7lG7ka3NdNV+uCoSNtmJT11UqTLOMp 3G9PVi1VHeUJ+wYUy1eHf8aayvATBMgRhLoXA8sLujXrINKrvd6ix2apbBs2YtWypkiI +lOynNlyCY2asAy91hAswwe7aX+P/rSh7HVRU= Original-Received: by 10.100.32.6 with SMTP id f6mr5392467anf.90.1229428704889; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:58:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878wqg4alp.fsf@nonospaz.fatphil.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:60681 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:34, Phil Carmody wrote: > In which case, why shouldn't we emacs proponents look on them with a sense > of shame? More than 3 times slower - is that not shameful? No, because Emacs is not optimized for that kind of use pattern. Juanma