From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:58:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <610112.22856.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229187522 15707 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2008 16:58:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, pandyacus@sbcglobal.net, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 13 17:59:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBXq9-0007nO-Au for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:59:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBXox-0003iT-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBXot-0003hT-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBXoq-0003el-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41280 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBXop-0003eZ-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244]:38221) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBXoo-0006Vg-2b; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:58:18 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so856247ana.21 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:58:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=j99pNL4JvJYQSplDIwXyxQW91p621gb2A3JzHnHDaEQ=; b=R66TmiSQnMNLRgPPl2DSTJuEzDfRoGFeoWxJik9uH84+g7JH9JCDamABo4GJm7t3cc r1u5T+T2gHfkIEvjPGy51Op7UjVUvWcxM4sPLme1MCN/BJjKTYPXOsjOqH4jVXq68x+H aIXx5hqgtl8k2LTEyhHC57PPndeJ6Ar3IJTO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=h0INnjcE/E9J09ykDaGPNyel9JAj2WcCQxAsMNzO+KUbJTynZ/+0b6+7ret7BY2pN3 goi5Y+xfI3+UOixd6/0D8AffkZenwGU3XZjgnxdi6maxDIL20XNWsGDFHe4PKFpZMUBT sDVWVAmYGAR9e6cWHxJfA3i1WTLMlVAz1ahV8= Original-Received: by 10.100.131.13 with SMTP id e13mr3625023and.57.1229187497387; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:58:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:58:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106877 Archived-At: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:40, Richard M Stallman wrote: > If the user wants to > program how to handle an emacsclient request in various circumstances, > it is much cleaner to write the program in Lisp, rather than in > arguments to a shell command. That's what we do. > Is there some reason why this CANNOT be done in Emacs? No. Juanma