From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:01:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <610112.22856.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <87fxks1uig.fsf@justinbogner.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229166110 24939 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2008 11:01:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mail@justinbogner.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 13 12:02:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBSGs-0003wl-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:02:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBSFh-0000u2-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBSFa-0000sa-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LBSFY-0000pe-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38661 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LBSFX-0000pQ-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:13159) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LBSFW-0000pa-QN; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so825227ana.21 for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:01:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=PU6ptZsWgGqKOOx98wKQVyW3sp9cbCdh1OVB8p74gHo=; b=Iq0UDwcXx876CFJyDWZ97zGAcLeNN75IoD9QJI+hLW0ADs/ZMWVhTQa6NPk4hEDwtw 60yFsQWXAv+7oXie6ogyR0zqE2HX7RC7FJe7tEyAxfyFMOT75K34HS9QBOK7Zssnhr9R d8sB4Ihota0HXfGDx3eVjQcw5w8jFxU+0ktEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=oVYTYXL/EA8uGDXwreZnZcPxF/q+GtWCSL1TndftrGSN46Zt83DRxkL8JYK7dbYuDC fx5+FlEsURRG7bQcebtqvc25n/fIWMSahBbts3uPub1Kr+AX9rLoiAxOk9W+M9aX4GpM WGIbjNFxIqc3bNZ30hH1TVAto3OouvT4olml0= Original-Received: by 10.100.31.10 with SMTP id e10mr3498521ane.83.1229166089106; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:01:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Dec 2008 03:01:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106870 Archived-At: On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:24, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Unless "something" includes "foo" as a substring, I don't see how it > is clearer. In this particular example, I see (if (featurep 'multi-tty) (something...) as cleaner, if `something' is code that depends on the multi-tty support, even if `something' does not include multi-tty in the name. (It is a different question whether `multi-tty', specificially, should be a feature or not.) > Yes, that's what Juanma says, I just am not sure I agree. It's OK. I'd bet most developers agree with you, anyway. :-) Juanma