From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: no executable emacs binary in exec-directory Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:51:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5am3bu5.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <878wr23arp.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227970299 11277 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2008 14:51:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Sven Joachim" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 29 15:52:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6RBU-00072S-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:52:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40288 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6RAL-00051M-2z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6RAA-0004s7-A8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6RA9-0004qk-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60133 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6RA9-0004qQ-6M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:51:13 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.241]:9174) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6RA8-0000eA-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so866006ana.21 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Mba7eznbjoB9YBAZC+TBhkz7tq6n5lxb/HZHyEIhhns=; b=dnVyz4WqCfeU1noa7IzI065uzVIyqynb0g7tcGnDVqtdSzCShA90c4MYTM51swx4HN gTdAOjSKCRON0doTKRDRJBEpIApaZGIMY8BUnq8LzF9GydqXLH7huGA772RzF8IjeCDW 3XmD0mH6HyQCRFZtCzLJIVvs2xNrHAe3HAUcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=LFQYQTjCnNfL6qh0ERQaE6mzRYvlFR7pqXveXnM1NzzXlkXNGng66Q100aBJ4EQTbX VnqQrXp/eqNT6kPrsQb84f61FPJ+knIYxXVDaTwSB3khlc8g3mnc7Ty3atUPmeG+TQnI LFQrysFD+J4CZAdZDkJb6uv8O3TZJtRJXuY8o= Original-Received: by 10.100.251.8 with SMTP id y8mr1419922anh.16.1227970272359; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:51:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <878wr23arp.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106305 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 14:46, Sven Joachim wrote: > Well, actually there is one possibility where invocation-directory is > the same as exec-directory: if you pass the same values for --bindir and > --libexecdir to `configure'. Aha. In Windows, these are both conflated into bin/. Thanks (and Stephen, too). Juanma