From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Server protocol (was: Re: error in server-running-p on M$) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18729.4337.83437.732524@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227462509 1689 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2008 17:48:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Ulrich Mueller , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 23 18:49:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4J5Q-0004IL-FD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:49:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J4H-0001B4-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J4C-00019B-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J4C-00018d-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59601 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J4C-00018T-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:34577) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L4J4B-00073n-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so759295ywk.66 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:48:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=D2ZT5osO3nKM4mvo9rSQIOIE4IhdXFl9F0GVvezytsw=; b=hW3zvW200tT/1kQzhqWxItc8eOJ2E2Gn4G4HbuUT+CwOSqAd5IqTY5bp95u/cXXOWZ JsGzU9zerX5aw4MHtvMloh44m0M0VIdAb+3LNWqXS96VRqVC0iiqC+Ll5T2p7F9Y0au1 k2ZPjqzOMXoj+XFKkDincK6Y/oRPn2plU/5ls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=fgxEEATfWDQAYbOOBF4Wn5MDxMleGSf6mRdiNygeyD3guln7evpHqvkJXwNMfNVRRJ 5xxWUVSMq7Q7/jYji7pOO8lKmKYXRCSLSpyInf946fTW62AvXbTRybQiHp3JOnYVhA9N 74MvQAS5sVhYsH62EQpCxFA5QzNyqQUKB3l0A= Original-Received: by 10.100.133.2 with SMTP id g2mr1158275and.134.1227462494546; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:48:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:48:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106041 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 17:33, dhruva wrote: > Would daemon option replace the need for server mode from the > functionality perspective or there is nothing related between them? The daemon option *uses* server.el / emacsclient. And it is perfectly reasonable to use server/emacsclient even if you're not interested in having a daemonized Emacs. Juanma