From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: files.el: Patch to make project-settings optional/customizable Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:41:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5f0ff9220811130629t505badf9kb1bcc380df89a08f@mail.gmail.com> <87zljrh93w.fsf@jurta.org> <200811221940.mAMJeMpj020419@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87ej13h73g.fsf@jurta.org> <200811222020.mAMKKBcY020496@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87zljrm7yh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200811230810.mAN8A6fp022636@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87ljvayb18.fsf@jurta.org> <200811231210.mANCAEv7023193@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227444129 13190 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2008 12:42:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:42:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "T.V. Raman" To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 23 13:43:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4EIl-0000Eu-Ax for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:42:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4EHb-0005Jf-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:41:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4EHQ-0005Ja-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4EHN-0005JL-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42018 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4EHN-0005JI-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:40601) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L4EHN-0002ni-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:41:34 -0500 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so706365ana.21 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DXxwmtc/9eAhif4C9LtpSq/0A5Zc7t949X3Gs+IEL9M=; b=EXUsgA2uIkcQhyCim+hLLXWezLhWwPPy+Kid4sROTLQV+CUnhdyuxmYcwYBf3m+CMC +Wo/QfZHJr8yPkIDksy5PAZJr4HTJ9oMKuA4oREmbuIiD6l+8snO8GQbkNdrtqYlpeut CVMBCmh/UUzKzAn5OWt+T20cBpjOZls1YrB3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=V6vngVmEaETHSvjlv5pU2sbFS1mLPK9CyTujReBI56U9LF6Rb5L2SOo3CJE2SOxXuK NhdoalY0iepe1+eh14XC8+qFulxsulydK4ghByyl4Rwj6yhkLOxLgHM/HqZQOb+UgwUl dNERsREAKcuQLQ1Yrjw/JVx4EtYIlhS0uXdm0= Original-Received: by 10.100.126.19 with SMTP id y19mr1094102anc.2.1227444092881; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:41:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200811231210.mANCAEv7023193@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106031 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 13:10, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > Why is the danger of redefining a function greater than simply using setq? The danger here is that when the original function is improved, the redefined one is not unless the user notices the changes. Juanma