From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient's option decoding code Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 12:42:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k5blzphq.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226058510 16823 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2008 11:48:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 07 12:49:32 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KyPqD-0002AR-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:49:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58820 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPp6-0005Ik-1X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPk0-0001Zp-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPjx-0001Xi-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51549 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KyPjw-0001XW-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:43:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]:64499) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KyPjt-0006eH-2u; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so1303288uga.17 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:42:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=1p7E6Z/lN6y/s5JmsrUEBerO9pSwMG5EKCL6986YHCw=; b=kpkhwywrmKZB7LqpnNPiCT3SkzP4YTbnQ2f/hjRusqOQazWQIH6btoxJ/4euM1vuVk Kyacp+cGlfSASZh6Pq/hNruQzhqqL/3312sE0eXILXVBvh3Bvb2eNUX+8pBaGKuHX4f3 wUdVI5618X4mHaLnd8P3Ntbj+J7d3zNJkueFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YZBnMW5VNQgLRcmD7C057+OT3+mplEiJI9vnUkxdUEDwMFXgsNh9I3Wg6R0QeOik6c 3FpKCF0jnfTSgPaXTVofk71qABybseHd2co2H7P168oR9OQ1aji+FiLjIYuRDI65K0Ox bcLVN48qIvgjLUAo0T5gK06sXeEKr1h/oD1Cw= Original-Received: by 10.210.43.10 with SMTP id q10mr3850593ebq.1.1226058174388; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:42:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.210.23.12 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:42:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105435 Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > When support for such a possibility is added to Emacs, > make-frame-on-display should be modified to use it. Since using that > API would be the first thing people will do after adding support for X > frames, I'm not worried that it will be forgotten. No, of course it won't be forgotten. But I don't see how making (make-frame ...) and (make-frame-on-display nil ...) be synonyms exclusively on Windows is a bonus. If a null display means "make a frame on the current display", it should be so for X too. Juanma