From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Docstring of `decode-coding-string' a bit misleading about insertion in buffer Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:21:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224525233 31852 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2008 17:53:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Kenichi Handa" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 20 19:54:51 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Krq3L-0007CM-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:23:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Krq2F-000540-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:22:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Krq1D-0004jT-NZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:21:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Krq1C-0004ik-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35970 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Krq1C-0004ic-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.154]:10044) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Krq1C-0007ny-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so266926yxf.66 for ; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZJE5ni+aOR1n7VTOSYw/CAfZ5Uh/Y2t2+2UFhURBaTE=; b=O+MHJJTzSJwUVXffcBIU8UggcSPs5MNqRz2NgwF7x3kSM9pyzwLjbt3afRtdWq79pM kym9KSZnJ0NFuqnqnDlpDqPG8Mae2crZzYQziLbMx0OB5Skw3rVF/SC0LMnRC/flxq4S URo3Co4Q//reYq7i9WFJvtJiXf5CntGDVFDsg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FEJf2aR73h7GMtr9NS7ka4FR/ON6CieI39XZEZsqvq4HiIAlhU4IaMbyaEZJHDTfmw /VKO66CxgyjqCPXYPxs47SMfYS0Ke9Ta/MqNrMaO15CJEfWCubloBXSsFqGplADm8v4u +aIcqYUPTRI9RpcoDHUdh9h79AjIHJdWnEPus= Original-Received: by 10.100.249.10 with SMTP id w10mr1207492anh.0.1224490896753; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:21:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104675 Archived-At: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:12, Kenichi Handa wrote: > Anyway, if we > write "inserted in buffer (after point and markers)", I > think it means the text is inserted without moving point and > markers. I'm sure it means that. I think I would still have missed it, because I misread the "inserted" as related to `insert', which moves the point. I would just add "The point does not move." or somesuch. But I'm not good writing docs. Juanma