From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 02:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BDC9F1.8090105@gmail.com> <48BDCBD1.4000505@gmail.com> <48BDCF20.1080305@gmail.com> <48BDD14B.7090302@gmail.com> <48BDD30E.4000304@gmail.com> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220400487 15092 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2008 00:08:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 02:09:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kafvg-0007hT-PB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kafuh-0002eX-LE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuL-0002Ua-25 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuJ-0002Td-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48203 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafuJ-0002TD-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:52166) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KafuI-0007hy-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m8307U8r028587; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:07:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m83057Ef027433; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:05:07 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Juanma Barranquero" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:05:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.122040000624958 (code B ref 865); Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:05:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Sep 2008 00:00:06 +0000 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m83002lp024793 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:00:04 -0700 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b20so455809ana.9 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:00:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=xov8V1j/GnkdjWqrCypQLkjR0BnU+587u1Skb7ssjJU=; b=gvhuPlMmHDGUZJmu9AgDOaW1m/ceLcYEdfiV3T2IPE8VkZCcpnXgJpo52fOHPGD5nI m4wF8yS7Uz0G3MIteijZDOPKfOgIQDN6hDZNFaavwCKHK5n2iCiDM3LObchN59a++Pkh XJN4Pcr82bUcGD06yfykoOQmqNnRr4Kn0FEPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vRjwyTAD2Pi3z01YUKVG4HDCz7xZnV66UnnkNW7CU2ak+tGeLFIZkKZN4gukIXXH1M rLj3yFervpQRA305qpig4R4PBb4Q78TID2BdrMnv0mfu+x7qZa3uDlhpweo51gfDc9M4 cd4EsBYlFY+vc/1U2CgMuJ9OTUqmg66UuINW8= Original-Received: by 10.100.249.10 with SMTP id w10mr8247605anh.139.1220400002669; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.194.19 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:00:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48BDD30E.4000304@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:07:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20058 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 01:58, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Just check if it exists immediately after the delete. As you have > pointed out some race condition (which one is unclear to me) can exist > so that it exists there again. > > However I did not say that we should raise an error in that case. It > might be legitimate. So we can perhaps instead check file modification > time and see if it is a new file. In that case we could just give a > message (which might be good for hunting errors). > > If file modification time says it is the same old file then it is an error. You want to do a lot of work for nothing. Juanma