From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:06:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BD74D5.4050800@gnu.org> <48BD80C0.80707@gmail.com> <48BD8FA8.6030707@gmail.com> <48BDC0EE.1080104@gmail.com> <48BDC5E4.4080205@gmail.com> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220398461 10221 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2008 23:34:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 23:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 01:35:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KafOi-0007rK-JO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:34:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54735 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafNh-0002Th-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHh-0000Pl-6d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHf-0000Ox-Hf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34135 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KafHf-0000Oo-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49659) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KafHe-0002l2-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82NRU7D014394; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:27:31 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m82NF3GS009704; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:15:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Juanma Barranquero" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:15:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 865-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B865.12203968037655 (code B ref 865); Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 865) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 23:06:43 +0000 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82N6dGk007649 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:06:41 -0700 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b20so451917ana.9 for <865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=TE6LV/PB5DNhvuFm3x9oE9+2cEMCiXO0Xoju4N4+CbA=; b=Ak0nGAFarssz8dxNNh4tM7nf1j9Hj8TQ6pyzxrWExnSUB0AB416GjqAazLnS2FKsop xFGXnnxPPR3RzM/NMMPqdR/ZcOS+Fa2AyAhho6BCZppGBQ3jYIYEkk1n7PR774wpvRzS qE2ZI5rBknbO584kPT1bkEajY9N24ff3VkvSo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sliuw+mlVUeGotHNU+as0urpa5emqUIC0/ma5Cti/un5goGwvCiDERjaU/kucqp/Mu 7osjtzKr/+38IO5A6Oduk/HUPwmHuL9ptjwrchMYGBow3YAS4H9urO5JdKpI+diM77bo 1Ck4Uo3p6LmSU8IiWWZneOutH26KwoXa3iMEo= Original-Received: by 10.100.255.17 with SMTP id c17mr8238866ani.76.1220396799431; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.194.19 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48BDC5E4.4080205@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20048 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 01:01, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Maybe it is better to just test if the file really was deleted then. And, again, how would you guarantee that the file isn't created by another process between the delete-file call and the check? > The reason I want to test this is that errors in these parts often are > confusing and hard to find. There could be something that prevents the > file from beeing deleted. The server file is deleted to make room for the new server file. If writing it fails, you'll notice. Are you chasing a real error, or the possibility of one? Juanma