From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: basic question: going back to dired Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <66d0c5e3-95d3-4c9b-a602-273375d6cf1f@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <87ljzuiayr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87prp5rhn2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216767162 29053 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2008 22:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Bastien Guerry" Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 23 00:53:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLQjP-0006Dk-Ra for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:53:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLQiW-00007U-Gc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLQhp-0008Jk-1R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLQhn-0008Hm-6v for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50353 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLQhm-0008Hd-Vj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]:9159) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLQhm-0002Rj-RM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so6648043nfi.26 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KDTUeGCXCA5hh9LArenK5rbTox1+b3gUUzf7UAMgnPc=; b=WS/jrofT2aKiHuV9I7NwiKLMmzhxVEnvdk5xUez3+RBaRfuiNmPRW0e42TCbGCR6Ua 7hbilTR1ZxS7gm+mV1Az1Fo0khsvw+Onzp6TO2PAq2kvIxR6lHIArJ3VJZJtAiQ9fQO/ PTjH7IlkIvW7KZemLepjlw+84LP22kEg6YFn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qwVCsByzJUMI83iTItUAIWzSfBUIVZDwCf7rcdfNIMZtgMZiF66wXiOGq6aVXvxiDh UbOkPSR7HbZ+qKXwHiWj4cU1EyMPgDCDWWpn06t8OmoU0kySKQLqAwS3Vttgz0n7N25H +opvh7fim+oQrR+00sHK2ctLwHZRXKPPkcgng= Original-Received: by 10.210.39.20 with SMTP id m20mr5098084ebm.126.1216767097494; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.71.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87prp5rhn2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:55827 Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 18:46, Bastien Guerry wrote: > My sentence above was a reaction to Xah's sentence: > > "Emacs doesn't have a keyboard shortcut for this due the fact that > emacs has build on the 1980's mindset and havn't modernized." Even so, I don't think he was arguing against the *concept* of buffers. > I don't think "buffer" and "workspaces" are synonymous, and I don't > think there is anything wrong with the current use of "buffer". We'll have to disagree, at least partially. Juanma