From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix UK spelling in comments and ChangeLog entries? Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:48:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85skuva3zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214812136 21070 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2008 07:48:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 30 09:49:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDE8p-00032h-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:49:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDE7z-00030R-Gm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDE7u-00030C-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDE7t-0002zu-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55380 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDE7t-0002zr-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:44617) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDE7s-0001e7-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.182]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDE7p-0004uK-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so610533ika.2 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IVyNAv2EWGbsG9Tfi6lkbr9rvRL6ytYnOF1Cl4nxP1s=; b=mkUMF0r0ZKp1H5CfBLdwbtntetyuS2ktJAeUP/nzN7FArVGnbsz4oGr5/tNTJXhxMZ 3LspvDcr9qcXAmt3an+wePwhqeU2+UWEU13/uIED3MXd0+COMtz2RnUmDqTsp24Zq2os 9ueRjwuTtXh4brx0i8XN9Uo2kLRivGiz8EhTM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=HaOk3rDrMpQyPH4Cz5rrCKkb2Ybfdmyi/5KBrod/YD95Oa9eHGeh0LAaq74RYGCBih HkLDVltxjZPiIeDPFI8dKgkcAWtdUTTLPRDIRuF7UPfXyRvsiJgy52vnMXT/1SwLnJVh B9p1C4uaoSF3tHmmwArTFIBwoIa7C0yLwJq5A= Original-Received: by 10.210.75.6 with SMTP id x6mr3875958eba.29.1214812112860; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.71.14 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:48:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85skuva3zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100197 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:25, David Kastrup wrote: > Well, those authors are presumably reading the Emacs developer list when > they are bothered about what happens "downstream" with their > contribution. So they can speak up for themselves. > > There is no need to invent hypothetical people to complicate things. They have done, at least two of them; if you count me in, that's at least three. So there's nothing "hypothetical" here. And, perhaps this escaped you, but I'm not "speaking up" for them, I'm agreeing with them. > No, it isn't. Yes, it is. [Shall we continue...?] Juanma