From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap not regenerating some *loaddefs Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:58:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4kmylieydz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <3hhcbpdyr5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <485B622D.6030201@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213948719 18510 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2008 07:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel Mailinglist To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 20 09:59:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9bWd-0000sA-DR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:59:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9bVo-00031w-MQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9bVk-00031Z-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9bVi-00030e-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:58:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55124 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9bVh-00030U-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.190]:25601) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9bVh-0001jV-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i36so224935gve.17 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:58:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=2OZFVWUiMkkkdQDfU9s3wi36dex4o4GvFh+eNPt1XYk=; b=T+RzRcoqodZ+AHQqyJ6CqJZjtkRE4/OQCEnWCPJO4+ogV7BNJR7zH5rA3eWfZLCr/Q kQN9Cqmm4meMCsYX+g+ZExqdVoeO7KMdzr5EaGEjNX70skmgdjVZCDcGvQiYUHBx5SAZ BHIfeE1P8qZmEnDf4Grjz0obvOYaWuKqb5+RI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CpEhcU7U4cV5rDKvwJ1wJ1T/CzyM4w5IDXIs87jWAGLCwT2+fwLhGFHfTXxdyjpaxk 9eei4U4WmY0+SPP/qVNvGWzhoduQXkOTGprMDz654gVUcsosr3ffS4HajM8jDYtrpdHA XSa599wk+gfYGPoOq1dRqwK2dnr8Eadxr17nM= Original-Received: by 10.210.46.12 with SMTP id t12mr2732881ebt.64.1213948695856; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:58:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.23.12 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:58:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <485B622D.6030201@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99507 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:54, Jason Rumney wrote: > It's a recent change to Makefile.in that has not been made to > makefile.w32-in. It was necessary before because it was necessary on all > platforms. Getting rid of that difference would be a good idea, then. One of many changes that would've been easier at the time... But first we should at least commit the changes I've done (or a parallel-friendly version of them, assuming they are not, which I don't know, because I can't try them in a parallel build), as they solve a specific problem. Juanma