From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap not regenerating some *loaddefs Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:38:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4kmylieydz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <3hhcbpdyr5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213904306 1825 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2008 19:38:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Rumney , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel Mailinglist To: "Glenn Morris" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 19 21:39:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9PyN-000426-CI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:39:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9PxY-0001Sz-K6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9PxT-0001St-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9PxS-0001Sb-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41769 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9PxS-0001SY-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.187]:15216) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9PxQ-0001EA-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i36so193822gve.17 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZfHU0uHRzPwMNLGYpmPrbJ73dGafFpgweGAQ3WBQRPc=; b=mKteM79X0xVbo5vf8UPqyU4J4jTa7PGDwr847VXyXx83LwCLm98CdcAlsaMdRRxErV Y0SaHkgp+nUoC8P5HT9iPtMbiDl3zoCZNkbffoeT0WeflB+tdZKSS+28yMXUs26n9CmJ OeloRKMxZBPps3HPbNeDKiEu12rHlDPccTl2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=qfCTcNQnSorXlsKMAYI7GL1j6ter8zPAestbJcSp1+Eh5lUrVzYQiXP2pcrqaBnKlw JinrLNKU8QZ2SuewTL8U9IufuSQlqN34wkYj72Yx3KlkIPVIKobQUgRxcEjaQxOQjVa3 Q3idirjDnWMro1zzaNHWvr8jcUVf2KcRidjqU= Original-Received: by 10.210.13.17 with SMTP id 17mr2250413ebm.1.1213904287707; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.23.12 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3hhcbpdyr5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99483 Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 21:13, Glenn Morris wrote: > Because the changes I refered to should be independent of whether > using Unix or Windows, since the emacs lisp files and their > dependencies are independent of arch. That does not answer my question. > You should avoid creating a base loaddefs by hand on windows, because > it should not be necessary, and otherwise someone will have to > remember to update the makefile rule every time the version in > autoload.el is changed. I agree that "it should not be necessary", but why was it deemed necessary would perhaps be better answered by the developer that implemented that on Windows in the first place. > It's basically just a case of syncing the makefile.w32-in with > Makefile.in. As I said: don't let my total lack of interest in fixing the makefiles stop you from doing it. Juanma