From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-selection-mode Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:04:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <004a01c8a1a0$7215cdd0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <85abjnu5ss.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <480C31B9.6060900@gmail.com> <480CC3AD.1050403@gmail.com> <85mynnxhuh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <480CD2D1.1020003@gmail.com> <878wz7xdgb.fsf@gmail.com> <85bq43xcq9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208804745 13797 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2008 19:05:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, ams@gnu.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Paul R , drew.adams@oracle.com To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 21:06:09 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jo1Kx-0001lT-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:06:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1KF-0007dW-LP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1KB-0007dH-FL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1K7-0007bA-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo1K7-0007al-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.191]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jo1K1-0003Rk-Va for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e11so557240rng.7 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jfjoIsuERz0JwS+NNR1wf+naxPhlq5oD13gkhhVD5l4=; b=Emllz52TJzUrt7E9b2vvR+qYf5hfaCVVzAs2uzQIb6tExYzffrEubPT/jnP+JPMGA+aulKJevnGCA6pwA2+HY2WTbIzDmurFfMf3abR25vNEw2ziKmzoHUakDPEkP6BX9GpyN+jvcXEYzErYZlh4o08cuaekwQytjzEWxs7NGqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W2n4JemVP+rs9L8ABx2wEX3OhNcmtNxjmgw3FvZx6uDrhjbC8e2/FY/OQC8V9FkpZQ3wqy77pQdA6nv2PQSiijy7I78q8IqzBSAEvLGOFhZ9+IH6XKm5ZPOCQT/1dTR3WbArjsq34+CJeG68szoPiXYOQh6ACOT1+lMrK7mnRVg= Original-Received: by 10.114.151.13 with SMTP id y13mr6376477wad.134.1208804690317; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.166.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85bq43xcq9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95675 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > After all: new users might give up because they don't realize that what > fails to make them more efficient than when using other editors is only > a default setting, not inherent to the emacs program itself. New users might give up because they don't realize that what fails to make them as efficient as when using other editors is only a default setting, not inherent to the emacs program itself. [It seems unfair to disregard theoretical new-user expectations unless they suit your argument...] Juanma