From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:51:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200804150020.m3F0KBMo012038@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200804150504.m3F53xoY007750@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208249562 11701 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 08:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 10:53:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jlgu0-0005Ok-4o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:52:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlgtL-0001DF-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlgtH-0001D6-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlgtF-0001Cm-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlgtF-0001Cj-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlgtF-0008IB-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so2699519wah.10 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:51:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VkMZjUjPiEJdZBrsItlf5hDvhHqXczifU7Y3E6ffMac=; b=BK2lYrQCmDbGfva9RR1iL++Oc8GPk8oWLE0Xt3/JPGUzVba8WBPJlyrf8+MB2kokXRJ1P+VgY11zYIkHQUXAr8cth1BImjSFLNfz6XmHQLIyTdha5Bk/K3eGdyDtHm0ohgSqC/5fed2az+WynUqqFWZpC5eBuDzwQejq4doA+nk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a0IXaCKgL5/6rbuBKdY7olpK45D8ljf1yJOomtoBY/S5i1rVjNgsW3efsia/iaDteRtx4oMx68pT9io0GL4terA+AcZNHc0sIFlUqP9HnmVMZcjrXYE/ZDS6dusSUyS7toa4EI1fWHQ6fP3JTrWOdb6ZrfTDjTfMBTCgxT3IgxQ= Original-Received: by 10.114.255.1 with SMTP id c1mr7967320wai.93.1208249503756; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.166.20 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:51:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200804150504.m3F53xoY007750@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95252 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > For me in the current CVS trunk with emacs -Q, they arguments are in > > the default face. > > As they are in 22.[12], but in that version they are upper case. They are not (in the default face, or shown uppercase). They are in the help-argument-name face. That change is in since around may 2004. > That is probably why nobody noticed this before... You're talking as if this was a bug, instead of a feature that was (long) discussed and consensuated. Please take a look at the mailing list archive. > Am I the only one thinking that downcasing the arguments is a misfeature? You're the only one to report a problem with it since mid-2004. Juanma